In re BP Lubricants USA, Inc., No. 10m960 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2011)(order)(holding that Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement applies to false marking claims under § 292).
Comment: This landmark decision will make it very difficult, if not possible, for any one to file false marking claims under 35 U.S.C. § 292.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - March 9, 2011
Altair Eng'g, Inc. v. LEDdynamics, Inc., No. 2010-1118 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2011).
Monday, February 28, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - February 28, 2011
Cancer Research Tech. Ltd. v. Barr Labs., Inc., No. 2010-1204 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2011) (per curiam order denying Barr Labs' petition for rehearing en banc with dissenting opinions by Judges Prost and Dyk).
Thursday, February 24, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - February 24, 2011
Siemens Med. Solu-tions USA, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc., Nos. 2010-1145, -1177 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 24, 2011).
Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc., No. 2010-1235 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 24, 2011).
Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc., No. 2010-1235 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 24, 2011).
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - February 23, 2011
Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., No. 2010-1144 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 23, 2010).
Friday, February 18, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - February 18, 2011
In re In re Katz Interrative Call Processing Patent Litigation, Nos. 2009-1450, -1451, -1452, -1468, -1469, 2010-1017 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 18, 2011).
Thursday, February 17, 2011
New Federal Circuit Opinions - February 17, 2011
ABB Inc v. Cooper Indus., LLC, No. 2010-1227 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2011).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)