The article co-authored by Mei & Mark's Jiwei Zhang and titled “3 Tips For Protecting Patent Rights At Chinese Customs” has been published in IP Law360 and International Trade Law360.
A copy of the article is reproduced here:
Law360, New York (July 18, 2013, 1:22 PM ET) — Many
intellectual property owners are familiar with functions of the U.S.
Custom and Border Protection in protecting their IP rights at the U.S.
border. CBP is authorized to exclude, detain and/or seize imported
merchandise that infringes federally registered and recorded trademarks
and copyrights and/or is covered by an exclusion order issued by the
U.S. International Trade Commission in patent cases. Many IP owners do
not know, however, that they can also take actions before infringing
merchandise arrive in the U.S.
The Customs of the People’s Republic of China (“CPRC”) is one
good example. It has procedures in place to protect IP rights. Article 3
of the “Regulation of the People’s Republic of China on the Customs
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights” states that “[t]he People’s
Republic of China forbids import or export of goods that infringe
intellectual property rights.” Since the procedures for protecting
trademarks and copyrights are well established, we focus on how patent
owners can take advantage of this regulation. Here are three practice
tips for patent owners.
1) Obtain Chinese Patents and Record Your Chinese Patents With CPRC
Article 2 of the Regulation states that “[c]ustoms protection
of intellectual property rights used in these Regulations refers to
protection of the exclusive right to use a trademark, copyright and
related rights, and patent right (referred hereinafter as ‘intellectual
property rights’) over imported or exported goods that are protected by
laws and administrative regulations of the People’s Republic of China.”
This means that only Chinese patent rights are protected by the
regulation. To become a Chinese patent owner, you could file an original
patent application, or you could file a patent application based on
your U.S. or Patent Cooperation Treaty application.
After you obtain a Chinese patent, you should consider
recording your Chinese patent with CPRC to protect your rights before
any infringing products are being exported from China. There are two
types of protection procedures provided by CPRC — application protection
procedure (“APP”) and duty protection procedure (“DPP”). APP is a
case-by-case procedure and does not require recordation of patent right.
Patent owners have to take initial action to initiate this CPRC
procedure.
DPP, however, requires recordation. Once recordation is
complete, CPRC will take initial action and inform patent owners when it
finds that suspected infringing products are about to be imported or
exported.
The requirements for recordation are as follows:
• CPRC requires that only patent owners and their agents can apply for recordation.
• Licensees are not qualified to apply for recordation.
• Either patent owners or their agents must be located in mainland China.
• One recordation could include one patent only.
• There cannot be more than two contact persons.
• The contact person(s) must be standby 24/7 to be contacted by the local CPRC office.
2) Keep an Eye on Your Competitors
It is crucial for patent owners to know their competitors well,
especially when they use APP without first recording their patents with
CPRC.
For example, in a 2011 case regarding APP, a well-known
printing supplies company in Zhuhai, China (“Company N”) found that
another local company (“Company S”) manufactured a large number of
printer cartridges for export to Japan using Company N’s patented
technology. [Note that the identities of the companies are withheld for
confidentiality reasons.] Although Company N did not record its patent
with CPRC, it still requested CPRC to detain Company S’s suspected
products and supplied supporting evidence.
On Nov. 24, 2011, CPRC suspended Company S’ clearance of
products. After further examination, CPRC confirmed that the infringing
products are over 40,000 in number. CPRC then seized these products.
Consequently, Company S and its Japanese client signed an agreement with
Company N and promised that they would not infringe Company N’s patents
in the future.
Even in DPP, a patent owner’s knowledge can help CPRC expedite
the process. For example, in a 2008 DPP case, an electronic technology
company (“Company A”) owns a patent regarding circuit breakers and
recorded the patent with CPRC. Company A exported most of its circuit
breakers to the U.S. When Company A noticed an unusual decease of its
market share, it investigated and found another company (“Company B”) in
Guangdong province that manufactured similar products for export to the
U.S. In January 2008, Company A purchased Company B’s suspected
products in the U.S. for evaluation. In May 2008, Company A filed a
request to CPRC in Shenzhen and CPRC subsequently detained the suspected
products.
3) Patent Owners Should Consider Obtaining Court Orders
In APP, once a patent owner’s detention application is
accepted, CPRC will issue a notice to detain suspected products.
Meanwhile, the patent owner needs to request a local court to issue a
preliminary injunction order to enjoin infringement or preserve
evidence. If a court order is issued within twenty business days after
the detention, CPRC will continue detaining the suspected products while
assisting the local court to make a final decision on infringement.
Otherwise, CPRC will release the suspected products.
In DPP, after recordation, CPRC will inform the patent owner
when it finds that suspected infringing products are about to be
imported or exported. Upon receiving the notification, the patent owner
needs to file an application requesting CPRC to detain the suspected
infringing products within three business days. CPRC will then determine
whether these products are indeed infringing products within 30
business days after the detention. Once CPRC finds infringement, it will
seize infringing products and issue penalties. If CPRC cannot determine
whether there is infringement, the patent owner would then need to
request a local court to issue a preliminary injunction order to enjoin
infringement or preserve evidence. If a court order is issued within 50
business days after the detention, CPRC will continue detaining the
suspected products while assisting the local court to make a final
decision on infringement. Otherwise, CPRC will release the suspected
products.
Therefore, in addition to working with the U.S. Customs and
Board Protection, IP owners, including patent owners, could also try to
stop infringing products at the country of production. If used properly,
it can be an effective option to protect one’s IP rights.
–By Mandy Wei, Ninestar Image Tech Limited, and Jiwei Zhang,
Mei & Mark LLP. Mandy Wei is a legal counsel at China-based Ninestar
Image Tech Limited. Jiwei Zhang is an attorney with Mei & Mark in
Washington, D.C.
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or
any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general
information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken
as legal advice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thanks for this general information about patent, this opinion impressed me and I think this kind of thoughts and ideas is kinda worth keeping-patent attorney Utah-
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete